Mercury Recall? Options

[Fed]

It looks like Mercury will have to issue a recall to replace every prop they have ever sold.
Only in America.... maybe.


Appeals court: Brunswick partially liable in prop accident
Posted on 01 June 2011
ShareThis Attention: open in a new window. Print

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week affirmed a decision handed down last year by a jury that Brunswick Corp. was partially liable for a 2005 accident on Lake Austin, Texas, in which a teen’s leg was severed by a propeller.

See Related Articles

Dustan McCoy: ‘The worst is over’
Brunswick expects gain in market share
Brunswick CEO to address Wells Fargo conference
Brunswick plant in Indiana marks safety milestone
Brunswick hands out family scholarships

The court’s decision, filed May 27, was unanimous.

Jacob Brochtrup brought the case against Mercury Marine and Sea Ray. He was 18 at the time of the accident.

On the day of the accident, Brochtrup and three others were in a 17.6-foot Sea Ray, powered by a 135-hp MerCruiser sterndrive. When one of the tow ropes unhooked and fell into the water, Brochtrup jumped in behind the boat to retrieve it, according to court documents.

The driver put the boat in reverse to stop its forward motion and backed over Brochtrup. The propeller shredded his right leg, which was ultimately amputated at the hip joint.

According to the original suit, the manufacturer of the boat and motor did not have safety devices, including guards or covers, to prevent Brochtrup from becoming entangled or stuck.

The case proceeded to trial three times, with the first two juries unable to reach a verdict. The third jury concluded that there was a design defect and awarded damages to Brochtrup.

Jurors ordered the company to pay $3.8 million in medical expenses and damages, finding that Brunswick shared more than half the blame for the accident. Jurors found that Brochtrup also was responsible, as was the driver of the boat.

The appeals court decision includes upholding the jury finding that an unguarded propeller was “unreasonably dangerous and defectively designed.” That jury finding necessarily included determining that a guard would prevent the injury and would not adversely affect the use of the boat or engine, Brochtrup’s lawyer Robby Alden said.

“The parties collectively spent over a million dollars testing the guard, and the jury heard substantial evidence from all experts,” Alden said in an e-mail to Soundings Trade Only. “Believe me, guards work and save lives.”

Brunswick did not immediately return a request for comment.

After last year’s verdict, Brunswick issued a statement saying they “stand behind our products, which are used safely and properly by boaters around the world.”

“While we at Brunswick remain sympathetic to the plaintiff for this unfortunate accident, we are nevertheless disappointed with today's verdict," Brunswick officials added last year.

[nimrod]

Not only Mercury but every engine maker. It's time people started being responsible for their own stupidity.
A woman orders a hot cup of coffee spills it all over herself then sues Maccas for serving her a hot cup of coffee.
The lawers get rich quick from law suits and it's a easy earn for them so they press the client into making a law suit.

[Jumpus GooDarus]

Only in america

[poly]

its a worry, its a worry, to sue or not to sue that is the question.
I find things like this tend to get blown out to the point were the company will do what they have to,,to prevent it happening again so we could well see guards on props down the track.

Paul